By James R. Beebe
Experimental epistemology makes use of experimental tools of the cognitive sciences to make clear debates inside of epistemology,the philosophical learn of information and rationally justified trust. during this first severe assortment in this intriguing new subfield, top researchers take on key questions bearing on wisdom, proof, and rationally justified trust.
Advances in Experimental Epistemology addresses principal epistemological matters reminiscent of no matter if matters in excessive stakes occasions have to own enhanced proof so as to have knowledge;whether and in what respects figuring out that p will depend on what activities one undertakes in mild of p; how philosophers should still reply to deep and pervasive confrontation approximately specific circumstances of data and trust and the methodological demanding situations to epistemology which are provided via confrontation in epistemic intuitions.As good as relocating study in epistemology ahead, this state of the art quantity is helping outline the long run process examine in experimental philosophy.
Read Online or Download Advances in Experimental Epistemology PDF
Similar epistemology books
Conjectures and Refutations is considered one of Karl Popper's so much wide-ranging and well known works, extraordinary not just for its acute perception into the way in which clinical wisdom grows, but in addition for employing these insights to politics and to heritage. It offers one of many clearest and such a lot obtainable statements of the elemental concept that guided his paintings: not just our wisdom, yet our goals and our criteria, develop via an never-ending strategy of trial and mistake.
During this first book-length exam of the Cartesian conception of visible conception, Celia Wolf-Devine explores the various philosophical implications of Descartes’ conception, concluding that he finally didn't offer a totally mechanistic thought of visible belief. Wolf-Devine lines the advance of Descartes’ considered visible notion opposed to the backdrop of the transition from Aristotelianism to the recent mechanistic science—the significant medical paradigm shift occurring within the 17th century.
Optimistic empiricism isn't just a view in regards to the goal of technological know-how; it's also a view in regards to the epistemological framework within which one may still debate the purpose of technology. this can be the point of interest of this publication – no longer with clinical fact, yet with how one may still argue approximately medical fact.
John MacFarlane debates how we would make experience of the concept that fact is relative, and the way we'd use this concept to offer enjoyable debts of components of our idea and speak that experience resisted conventional tools of study. even if there's a gigantic philosophical literature on relativism approximately fact, going again to Plato's Theaetetus, this literature (both professional and con) has tended to target refutations of the doctrine, or refutations of those refutations, on the fee of claiming truly what the doctrine is.
- The Routledge Guidebook to Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (The Routledge Guides to the Great Books)
- Empiricism and Experience
- The philosophy of W.V. Quine, Edition: Exp Sub
- Square One: The Foundations of Knowledge
- Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices
- Pluralism in Mathematics: A New Position in Philosophy of Mathematics (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, Volume 32)
Additional resources for Advances in Experimental Epistemology
And no interaction effect was found. Discussion As mentioned above, there was a significant main effect for stakes. This supports (H): that folk attributions of knowledge are sensitive to practical interests. However, there is no significant main effect for probability. Nor were there statistically significant differences between LSLP and LSHP or between HSLP and HSHP. So we failed to get good evidence that probability plays a role in knowledge attributions. However, two facts suggest that further research may discover such a role.
But do people actually hold the views they’re assumed to hold? We did the necessary empirical work to find out. We studied people’s reactions to lottery cases and discovered that they respond as predicted. We report those results here. We also evaluate three previous explanations for why people deny knowledge in lottery cases; none of them seems to work. Finally, we present evidence for a new explanation for why some people deny knowledge in lottery cases. We suggest that they deny knowledge in lottery cases due to formulaic expression.
Experiment 1 of this study reports results that support RKP. It should be flagged, however, that RKP is a strong principle. 22 Consider the weaker principle, ACTION: (ACTION) (Where P is relevant for action) If X knows P, then it is appropriate for X to act on P. Experiment 2 will report on some evidence which suggests that the folk accept ACTION. ) Method For this experiment, we test whether people implicitly accept RKP. To do this, we revisit Study 1, Experiment 2 (Air). ” Now, right before we asked Experimental Evidence Supporting Anti-intellectualism About Knowledge 27 this “knowledge” question, we asked subjects a normative question about the relevant action in the vignette: Recall that according to the story, Jessie has already surveyed the entire roster once.